這個星期參加了一個面試,面試中問到深淺拷貝的區別,然後我就簡單了講述了它們的之間的區別,然後面試官又繼續問,如何實現一個深拷貝呢?當時只回答回答了一種方式,就是使用反射,然後面試官提示還可以通過反序列化和表達樹的方式。然後又繼續問,如果用反射來實現深拷貝的話,如何解決互相引用對象的問題呢? 當時我給出的答案是說那就不用反射去實現呗,用反序列化實現呗,或者直接避免使兩個對象互相引用呗。然後面試官說,如果一定用反射來寫,你是怎麼去解決這個問題呢?這時候我就愣住了。
這樣也就有了這篇文章。今天就來深入解析下深淺拷貝的問題。
首先,講到深淺拷貝,自然就有一個問題來了?什麼是深拷貝,什麼又是淺拷貝呢?下面就具體介紹下它們的定義。
深拷貝:指的是拷貝一個對象時,不僅僅把對象的引用進行復制,還把該對象引用的值也一起拷貝。這樣進行深拷貝後的拷貝對象就和源對象互相獨立,其中任何一個對象的改動都不會對另外一個對象造成影響。舉個例子,一個人叫張三,然後使用克隆技術以張三來克隆另外一個人叫李四,這樣張三和李四就是相互獨立的,不管張三缺胳膊還是李四少腿了都不會影響另外一個人。在.NET領域,值對象就是典型的例子,如int, Double以及結構體和枚舉等。具體例子如下所示:
int source = 123; // 值類型賦值內部執行深拷貝 int copy = source; // 對拷貝對象進行賦值不會改變源對象的值 copy = 234; // 同樣對源對象賦值也不會改變拷貝對象的值 source = 345;
淺拷貝:指的是拷貝一個對象時,僅僅拷貝對象的引用進行拷貝,但是拷貝對象和源對象還是引用同一份實體。此時,其中一個對象的改變都會影響到另一個對象。例如,一個人一開始叫張三,後來改名字為張老三了,可是他們還是同一個人,不管張三缺胳膊還是張老三少腿,都反應在同一個人身上。在.NET中引用類型就是一個例子。如類類型。具體例子如下所示:
public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Person sourceP = new Person() { Name = "張三" };
Person copyP = sourceP; // 淺拷貝
copyP.Name = "張老三"; // 拷貝對象改變Name值
// 結果都是"張老三",因為實現的是淺拷貝,一個對象的改變都會影響到另一個對象
Console.WriteLine("Person.Name: [SourceP: {0}] [CopyP:{1}]", sourceP.Name, copyP.Name);
Console.Read();
}
}
上面已經明白了深淺拷貝的定義,至於他們之間的區別也在定義中也有所體現。介紹完了它們的定義和區別之後,自然也就有了如何去實現它們呢?
對於,淺拷貝的實現方式很簡單,.NET自身也提供了實現。我們知道,所有對象的父對象都是System.Object對象,這個父對象中有一個MemberwiseClone方法,該方法就可以用來實現淺拷貝,下面具體看看淺拷貝的實現方式,具體演示代碼如下所示:
// 繼承ICloneable接口,重新其Clone方法
class ShallowCopyDemoClass : ICloneable
{
public int intValue = 1;
public string strValue = "1";
public PersonEnum pEnum = PersonEnum.EnumA;
public PersonStruct pStruct = new PersonStruct() { StructValue = 1};
public Person pClass = new Person("1");
public int[] pIntArray = new int[] { 1 };
public string[] pStringArray = new string[] { "1" };
#region ICloneable成員
public object Clone()
{
return this.MemberwiseClone();
}
#endregion
}
class Person
{
public string Name;
public Person(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
}
public enum PersonEnum
{
EnumA = 0,
EnumB = 1
}
public struct PersonStruct
{
public int StructValue;
}
上面類中重寫了IConeable接口的Clone方法,其實現直接調用了Object的MemberwiseClone方法來完成淺拷貝,如果想實現深拷貝,也可以在Clone方法中實現深拷貝的邏輯。接下來就是對上面定義的類進行淺拷貝測試了,看看是否是實現的淺拷貝,具體演示代碼如下所示:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ShallowCopyDemo();
// List淺拷貝的演示
ListShallowCopyDemo();
}
public static void ListShallowCopyDemo()
{
List<PersonA> personList = new List<PersonA>()
{
new PersonA() { Name="PersonA", Age= 10, ClassA= new A() { TestProperty = "AProperty"} },
new PersonA() { Name="PersonA2", Age= 20, ClassA= new A() { TestProperty = "AProperty2"} }
};
// 下面2種方式實現的都是淺拷貝
List<PersonA> personsCopy = new List<PersonA>(personList);
PersonA[] personCopy2 = new PersonA[2];
personList.CopyTo(personCopy2);
// 由於實現的是淺拷貝,所以改變一個對象的值,其他2個對象的值都會發生改變,因為它們都是使用的同一份實體,即它們指向內存中同一個地址
personsCopy.First().ClassA.TestProperty = "AProperty3";
WriteLog(string.Format("personCopy2.First().ClassA.TestProperty is {0}", personCopy2.First().ClassA.TestProperty));
WriteLog(string.Format("personList.First().ClassA.TestProperty is {0}", personList.First().ClassA.TestProperty));
WriteLog(string.Format("personsCopy.First().ClassA.TestProperty is {0}", personsCopy.First().ClassA.TestProperty));
Console.Read();
}
public static void ShallowCopyDemo()
{
ShallowCopyDemoClass DemoA = new ShallowCopyDemoClass();
ShallowCopyDemoClass DemoB = DemoA.Clone() as ShallowCopyDemoClass ;
DemoB.intValue = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" int->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.intValue, DemoB.intValue));
DemoB.strValue = "2";
WriteLog(string.Format(" string->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.strValue, DemoB.strValue));
DemoB.pEnum = PersonEnum.EnumB;
WriteLog(string.Format(" Enum->[A: {0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.pEnum, DemoB.pEnum));
DemoB.pStruct.StructValue = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" struct->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", DemoA.pStruct.StructValue, DemoB.pStruct.StructValue));
DemoB.pIntArray[0] = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" intArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.pIntArray[0], DemoB.pIntArray[0]));
DemoB.pStringArray[0] = "2";
WriteLog(string.Format("stringArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.pStringArray[0], DemoB.pStringArray[0]));
DemoB.pClass.Name = "2";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Class->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", DemoA.pClass.Name, DemoB.pClass.Name));
Console.WriteLine();
}
private static void WriteLog(string msg) { Console.WriteLine(msg); } } }
上面代碼的運行結果如下圖所示:

從上面運行結果可以看出,.NET中值類型默認是深拷貝的,而對於引用類型,默認實現的是淺拷貝。所以對於類中引用類型的屬性改變時,其另一個對象也會發生改變。
上面已經介紹了淺拷貝的實現方式,那深拷貝要如何實現呢?在前言部分已經介紹了,實現深拷貝的方式有:反射、反序列化和表達式樹。在這裡,我只介紹反射和反序列化的方式,對於表達式樹的方式在網上也沒有找到,當時面試官說是可以的,如果大家找到了表達式樹的實現方式,麻煩還請留言告知下。下面我們首先來看看反射的實現方式吧:
// 利用反射實現深拷貝
public static T DeepCopyWithReflection<T>(T obj)
{
Type type = obj.GetType();
// 如果是字符串或值類型則直接返回
if (obj is string || type.IsValueType) return obj;
if (type.IsArray)
{
Type elementType = Type.GetType(type.FullName.Replace("[]", string.Empty));
var array = obj as Array;
Array copied = Array.CreateInstance(elementType, array.Length);
for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
{
copied.SetValue(DeepCopyWithReflection(array.GetValue(i)), i);
}
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(copied, obj.GetType());
}
object retval = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());
PropertyInfo[] properties = obj.GetType().GetProperties(
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic
| BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static);
foreach (var property in properties)
{
var propertyValue = property.GetValue(obj, null);
if (propertyValue == null)
continue;
property.SetValue(retval, DeepCopyWithReflection(propertyValue), null);
}
return (T)retval;
}
反序列化的實現方式,反序列化的方式也可以細分為3種,具體的實現如下所示:
// 利用XML序列化和反序列化實現
public static T DeepCopyWithXmlSerializer<T>(T obj)
{
object retval;
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
{
XmlSerializer xml = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
xml.Serialize(ms, obj);
ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
retval = xml.Deserialize(ms);
ms.Close();
}
return (T)retval;
}
// 利用二進制序列化和反序列實現
public static T DeepCopyWithBinarySerialize<T>(T obj)
{
object retval;
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
{
BinaryFormatter bf = new BinaryFormatter();
// 序列化成流
bf.Serialize(ms, obj);
ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
// 反序列化成對象
retval = bf.Deserialize(ms);
ms.Close();
}
return (T)retval;
}
// 利用DataContractSerializer序列化和反序列化實現
public static T DeepCopy<T>(T obj)
{
object retval;
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
{
DataContractSerializer ser = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
ser.WriteObject(ms, obj);
ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
retval = ser.ReadObject(ms);
ms.Close();
}
return (T)retval;
}
// 表達式樹實現
// ....
上面反射的實現方式,對於相互引用的對象會出現StackOverflower的錯誤,由於對象的相互引用,會導致方法循環調用。下面就是一個相互引用對象的例子:
[Serializable]
public class DeepCopyDemoClass
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public int[] pIntArray { get; set; }
public Address Address { get; set; }
public DemoEnum DemoEnum { get; set; }
// DeepCopyDemoClass中引用了TestB對象,TestB類又引用了DeepCopyDemoClass對象,從而造成了相互引用
public TestB TestB {get;set;}
public override string ToString()
{
return "DeepCopyDemoClass";
}
}
[Serializable]
public class TestB
{
public string Property1 { get; set; }
public DeepCopyDemoClass DeepCopyClass { get; set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return "TestB Class";
}
}
[Serializable]
public struct Address
{
public string City { get; set; }
}
public enum DemoEnum
{
EnumA = 0,
EnumB = 1
}
在面試過程中,針對這個問題的解決方式我回答的是不知道,回來之後思考了之後,也就有了點思路。首先想到的是:能不能用一個字典來記錄每個對象被反射的次數,仔細想想可行,於是開始實現,初步修復後的反射實現如下所示:
public class DeepCopyHelper
{
// 用一個字典來存放每個對象的反射次數來避免反射代碼的循環遞歸
static Dictionary<Type, int> typereflectionCountDic = new Dictionary<Type, int>();
public static T DeepCopyWithReflection_Second<T>(T obj)
{
Type type = obj.GetType();
// 如果是字符串或值類型則直接返回
if (obj is string || type.IsValueType) return obj;
if (type.IsArray)
{
Type elementType = Type.GetType(type.FullName.Replace("[]", string.Empty));
var array = obj as Array;
Array copied = Array.CreateInstance(elementType, array.Length);
for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
{
copied.SetValue(DeepCopyWithReflection_Second(array.GetValue(i)), i);
}
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(copied, obj.GetType());
}
// 對於類類型開始記錄對象反射的次數
int reflectionCount = Add(typereflectionCountDic, obj.GetType());
if (reflectionCount > 1)
return obj; // 這裡有錯誤
object retval = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());
PropertyInfo[] properties = obj.GetType().GetProperties(
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic
| BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static);
foreach (var property in properties)
{
var propertyValue = property.GetValue(obj, null);
if (propertyValue == null)
continue;
property.SetValue(retval, DeepCopyWithReflection_Second(propertyValue), null);
}
return (T)retval;
}
private static int Add(Dictionary<Type, int> dict, Type key)
{
if (key.Equals(typeof(String)) || key.IsValueType) return 0;
if (!dict.ContainsKey(key))
{
dict.Add(key, 1);
return dict[key];
}
dict[key] += 1;
return dict[key];
}
}
下面用代碼來測試下上面的代碼是否已經解決了循環遞歸的問題,具體的測試代碼如下所示:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//ShallowCopyDemo();
//ListShallowCopyDemo();
DeepCopyDemo();
DeepCopyDemo2();
}
private static void WriteLog(string msg)
{
Console.WriteLine(msg);
}
public static void DeepCopyDemo()
{
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassA = new DeepCopyDemoClass();
deepCopyClassA.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemo";
deepCopyClassA.pIntArray = new int[] { 1 };
deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumA;
deepCopyClassA.Address = new Address() { City = "Shanghai" };
deepCopyClassA.TestB = new TestB() { Property1 = "TestProperty", DeepCopyClass = deepCopyClassA };
// 使用反序列化來實現深拷貝
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithBinarySerialize<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
deepCopyClassB.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemoB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.Name, deepCopyClassB.Name));
deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0] = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" intArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.pIntArray[0], deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0]));
deepCopyClassB.Address = new Address() { City = "Beijing" };
WriteLog(string.Format(" Addressstruct->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.Address.City, deepCopyClassB.Address.City));
deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumB;
WriteLog(string.Format(" DemoEnum->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum, deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum));
deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1 = "TestPropertyB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Property1->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.Property1, deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1));
WriteLog(string.Format(" TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name, deepCopyClassB.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name));
Console.WriteLine();
}
public static void DeepCopyDemo2()
{
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassA = new DeepCopyDemoClass();
deepCopyClassA.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemo";
deepCopyClassA.pIntArray = new int[] { 1, 2 };
deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumA;
deepCopyClassA.Address = new Address() { City = "Shanghai" };
deepCopyClassA.TestB = new TestB() { Property1 = "TestProperty", DeepCopyClass = deepCopyClassA };
// 使用反射來完成深拷貝
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithReflection_Second<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
//DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithReflection<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
deepCopyClassB.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemoB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.Name, deepCopyClassB.Name));
deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0] = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" intArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.pIntArray[0], deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0]));
deepCopyClassB.Address = new Address() { City = "Beijing" };
WriteLog(string.Format(" Addressstruct->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.Address.City, deepCopyClassB.Address.City));
deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumB;
WriteLog(string.Format(" DemoEnum->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum, deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum));
deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1 = "TestPropertyB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Property1->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.Property1, deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1));
WriteLog(string.Format(" TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name, deepCopyClassB.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name));
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
此時的運行結果如下圖所示:

剛開始看到這樣的運行結果,開心地以為已經解決了循環遞歸的問題了,因為此時結果成功運行出來了,沒有了StackOverflower的錯誤了。但是仔細一看,反序列化和反射完成的深拷貝的運行結果不一樣,如上圖中紅色圈出來的部分。顯然,反序列化的結果是沒有錯誤的,顯然目前實現的反射代碼還是有問題的。接下來就是思考了。為什麼上面反射的代碼不正確呢?
仔細分析DeepCopyWithReflection_Second中的代碼,發現下面代碼紅色部分是錯誤的:
int reflectionCount = Add(typereflectionCountDic, obj.GetType());
if (reflectionCount > 1)
return obj; // 是錯誤的
對DeepCopyWithReflection_Second方法仔細分析,在對TestB進行反射時,當反射到DeepCopyClass屬性時,此時會遞歸調用DeepCopyWithReflection_Second方法,此時在typereflectionCountDic發現DeepCopyDemoClass已經被反射了,則直接返回,這樣分析好像沒什麼錯誤,但是此時返回的是deepCopyClassA對象,但是我們需要返回的是deepCopyClassB對象,即此時deepCopyClassB對象的內存結構如下圖所示:
public static T DeepCopyWithReflection_Third<T>(T obj)
{
Type type = obj.GetType();
// 如果是字符串或值類型則直接返回
if (obj is string || type.IsValueType) return obj;
if (type.IsArray)
{
Type elementType = Type.GetType(type.FullName.Replace("[]", string.Empty));
var array = obj as Array;
Array copied = Array.CreateInstance(elementType, array.Length);
for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
{
copied.SetValue(DeepCopyWithReflection_Second(array.GetValue(i)), i);
}
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(copied, obj.GetType());
}
int reflectionCount = Add(typereflectionCountDic, obj.GetType());
if (reflectionCount > 1 && obj.GetType() == typeof(DeepCopyDemoClass))
return (T)DeepCopyDemoClasstypeRef; // 返回deepCopyClassB對象
object retval = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());
if(retval.GetType() == typeof(DeepCopyDemoClass))
DeepCopyDemoClasstypeRef = retval; // 保存一開始創建的DeepCopyDemoClass對象
PropertyInfo[] properties = obj.GetType().GetProperties(
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic
| BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static);
foreach (var property in properties)
{
var propertyValue = property.GetValue(obj, null);
if (propertyValue == null)
continue;
property.SetValue(retval, DeepCopyWithReflection_Third(propertyValue), null);
}
return (T)retval;
}
下面我用DeepCopyWithReflection_Third方法來測試下,具體的測試代碼如下所示:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//ShallowCopyDemo();
//ListShallowCopyDemo();
DeepCopyDemo();
DeepCopyDemo2();
}
private static void WriteLog(string msg)
{
Console.WriteLine(msg);
}
public static void DeepCopyDemo()
{
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassA = new DeepCopyDemoClass();
deepCopyClassA.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemo";
deepCopyClassA.pIntArray = new int[] { 1 };
deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumA;
deepCopyClassA.Address = new Address() { City = "Shanghai" };
deepCopyClassA.TestB = new TestB() { Property1 = "TestProperty", DeepCopyClass = deepCopyClassA };
// 使用反序列化來實現深拷貝
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithBinarySerialize<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
deepCopyClassB.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemoB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.Name, deepCopyClassB.Name));
deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0] = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" intArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.pIntArray[0], deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0]));
deepCopyClassB.Address = new Address() { City = "Beijing" };
WriteLog(string.Format(" Addressstruct->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.Address.City, deepCopyClassB.Address.City));
deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumB;
WriteLog(string.Format(" DemoEnum->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum, deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum));
deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1 = "TestPropertyB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Property1->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.Property1, deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1));
WriteLog(string.Format(" TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name, deepCopyClassB.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name));
Console.WriteLine();
}
public static void DeepCopyDemo2()
{
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassA = new DeepCopyDemoClass();
deepCopyClassA.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemo";
deepCopyClassA.pIntArray = new int[] { 1, 2 };
deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumA;
deepCopyClassA.Address = new Address() { City = "Shanghai" };
deepCopyClassA.TestB = new TestB() { Property1 = "TestProperty", DeepCopyClass = deepCopyClassA };
// 使用反射來完成深拷貝
DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithReflection_Third<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
//DeepCopyDemoClass deepCopyClassB = DeepCopyHelper.DeepCopyWithReflection<DeepCopyDemoClass>(deepCopyClassA);
deepCopyClassB.Name = "DeepCopyClassDemoB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.Name, deepCopyClassB.Name));
deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0] = 2;
WriteLog(string.Format(" intArray->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.pIntArray[0], deepCopyClassB.pIntArray[0]));
deepCopyClassB.Address = new Address() { City = "Beijing" };
WriteLog(string.Format(" Addressstruct->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.Address.City, deepCopyClassB.Address.City));
deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum = DemoEnum.EnumB;
WriteLog(string.Format(" DemoEnum->[A: {0}] [B: {1}]", deepCopyClassA.DemoEnum, deepCopyClassB.DemoEnum));
deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1 = "TestPropertyB";
WriteLog(string.Format(" Property1->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.Property1, deepCopyClassB.TestB.Property1));
WriteLog(string.Format(" TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name->[A:{0}] [B:{1}]", deepCopyClassA.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name, deepCopyClassB.TestB.DeepCopyClass.Name));
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
此時的運行結果如下圖示所示:

從上面的測試結果可以看出,此時深拷貝的反射實現方法基本上沒什麼問題了。這個方法也同時解決了相互引用對象的循環遞歸問題。
到這裡,該文章的內容就結束。這裡主要記錄下自己在一次面試過程中遇到問題的一次總結,從中可以看出,反射進行深拷貝會有很多其他的問題,所以平時還是建議大家使用序列化的形式來進行深拷貝。
最後附上本文所有源碼下載:DeepCopy.zip